Multidisciplinary Cancer Investigation
Sat, Apr 20, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 4, Issue 2 (Multidisciplinary Cancer Investigation 2020)
Multidiscip Cancer Investig 2020, 4(2): 21-27 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sourmeh A, Mashhadi A, Sepehri Shamloo Z. The Effectiveness of Group-Based Compassion- Focused Therapy on Depression, Anxiety and Improving the Quality of Life in Women With Feminine Cancers. Multidiscip Cancer Investig 2020; 4 (2) :21-27
URL: http://mcijournal.com/article-1-262-en.html
URL: http://mcijournal.com/article-1-262-en.html
1- Department of psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran , mashhadi@um.ac.ir
2- Department of psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran , mashhadi@um.ac.ir
Abstract: (2885 Views)
Introduction: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of group-based compassion-focused therapy (CFT) on depression, anxiety, and improving the quality of life (QoL) in women with feminine cancers.
Methods: A pretest-posttest control‐grouped, quasi‐experimental study was carried out on all women with cancer who were referred to the Omid Hospital of Mashhad in 2019. Thirty patients with various types of feminine cancers were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of group-based compassion-focused therapy (CFT) (n=15) or sham control (n=15). Participants in both conditions completed measures of Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI-II), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at pretest and posttest. Analysis of covariance was used for data analysis.
Results: Our results showed that there was a significant difference between experimental and sham control groups in depression (F= 4/499, P<0.05, d=1.60 large) and anxiety (F=19/99, P<0.01, d=1.96 large), but there was no significant difference in participants’ QoL scale.
Conclusions: Group-based CFT could be considered a promising and potentially useful intervention to alleviate the depression and anxiety in cancer patients but it did not affect their QoL. Nevertheless, future randomized trials are needed.
Methods: A pretest-posttest control‐grouped, quasi‐experimental study was carried out on all women with cancer who were referred to the Omid Hospital of Mashhad in 2019. Thirty patients with various types of feminine cancers were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of group-based compassion-focused therapy (CFT) (n=15) or sham control (n=15). Participants in both conditions completed measures of Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI-II), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at pretest and posttest. Analysis of covariance was used for data analysis.
Results: Our results showed that there was a significant difference between experimental and sham control groups in depression (F= 4/499, P<0.05, d=1.60 large) and anxiety (F=19/99, P<0.01, d=1.96 large), but there was no significant difference in participants’ QoL scale.
Conclusions: Group-based CFT could be considered a promising and potentially useful intervention to alleviate the depression and anxiety in cancer patients but it did not affect their QoL. Nevertheless, future randomized trials are needed.
Select article type: Original/Research Article |
Received: 2020/01/30 | Accepted: 2020/03/11 | ePublished: 2020/04/1
Received: 2020/01/30 | Accepted: 2020/03/11 | ePublished: 2020/04/1
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
